四海人民公摄 - 海外华人摄影爱好者论坛

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 456|回复: 5

大头来学习一下民主法治之下如何合法行贿与受贿

[复制链接]
发表于 2011-11-16 00:27:52 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
http://news.yahoo.com/visas-courtship-nancy-pelosi-032100907.html

Visa has long bragged about its rewards program for consumers.

So when its lucrative swipe fees got caught in the congressional crosshairs a few years back,

the credit-card giant developed a special program for then–House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to feel its influence.

The lobbying campaign, reconstructed by Newsweek through interviews and documents,

speaks volumes about the efforts of big business to curry favor,

even among perceived enemies.


It also shows how such efforts can personally and politically benefit politicians,

even ones like Pelosi who set out to suffocate the “culture of corruption” in Washington

or ultimately didn’t give Visa what it wanted.

The tale begins in 2007, when the credit-card industry became concerned that the new Democrats

who took charge of Congress after the 2006 elections were intent on passing legislation to curtail credit-card swipe fees to vendors,

which were worth billions of dollars in revenues in the industry,

and to create new protections for consumers.

Visa had never been particularly close to Pelosi,

a frequent critic of the financial industry,

even though the credit-card giant’s headquarters were in her hometown of San Francisco.

But the army of lobbyists Visa assembled—it had a total of 14 lobbying firms at its disposal—set out to try to woo Pelosi with a strategic campaign,

hoping to forestall action on any credit-card legislation until after the 2008 presidential election.

“Was there a concerted effort to press Pelosi? Yes. It was partly that she was speaker.

But also that Visa’s based out [in her district], where she’s from.

They were under attack. It was the confluence between her position and when she engaged she would be intense,”

says a lobbyist directly familiar with the effort who spoke on the condition of anonymity

because he wasn’t authorized to talk to the press about internal strategy.

“We were sitting around the table and decided we needed a concerted effort related to Pelosi.

We needed a full-court press.”

The effort began in earnest in late 2007.

Ogilvy, one of Visa's outside lobbying firms,

picked off one of Pelosi’s government-affairs advisers, Dean Aguillen,

who had close ties in the speaker’s office.

Aguillen quit the speaker’s team and went to Ogilvy in December 2007.

By law he was unable to lobby his former boss for a year,

but he immediately registered to lobby Congress on the credit-card issue,

offering guidance to other lobbyists on Visa’s team during strategy sessions,

according to a lobbyist present in strategy deliberations.

In an interview, Aguillen told Newsweek he worked for Visa on the credit-card-legislation issue

and sporadically talked with his former colleagues in Pelosi’s office.

“It’s public record that I advocated on behalf of Visa the past few years,” he said.

“I didn’t set up a meeting with the speaker directly, but I’ve definitely done some outreach to the House individually.

What we did is help Visa build and maintain strong relationships and a strong reputation.”

Aguillen said he didn’t have any lobbying contact the first year after he left Pelosi’s office,

but starting in 2009 he did aim to maintain the relationships,

and talked about the various issues he was working on.

Asked whether Visa was using his connections for access, he demurred.

“This is my first venture into the private sector.

I hope that I had done enough that people would find me to be an asset.”

Visa wanted to meet with Pelosi and her top aides to make the case against the swipe fees.

That summer Visa’s outgoing CEO, Carl Pascarella,

bumped into Pelosi on the street in the San Francisco neighborhood they share,

and she arranged for him to contact her Washington office for a meet-and-greet,

according to sources families with the encounter.

Around the same time—on July 21, 2008,

to be exact—Pelosi’s reelection campaign received a $1,000 donation from Visa’s political-action committee.

Two days later, according to Pelosi’s office,

the speaker met Pascarella and the incoming Visa chief executive, Joe Saunders, in her Capitol Hill office.

The three exchanged pleasantries and no specific legislation was discussed, according to Pelosi’s office.

Aguillen, for his part, also contributed $1,000 to Pelosi

and another $1,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee during the first half of 2008.

Separately, Pelosi’s husband, Paul, a major investor in California,

got a lucrative phone call—a pre-screen invite in March 2008 to take part in Visa’s $17.9 billion public stock offering,

at the time one of the hottest stock offerings in an otherwise soft market.

The initial-public-offering price was $44 per share and was limited to institutional investors

and a group of specially selected individuals. Almost $18 billion was made available in public stock to preselected investors.

Paul Pelosi made the cut.

The top financial institution to handle the sale was Wells Fargo Shareholder Services,

a bank where Paul Pelosi, a seasoned investor, held an account. Before the IPO,

Pelosi received a call from his financial adviser at Wells Fargo alerting him

that he had been approved to purchase Visa stock and,

considering the public buzz around the stock, recommending he buy, according to Pelosi’s office.

Paul Pelosi initially bought 5,000 shares at the $44 initial price.

Within a couple of days, the shares' value soared to $64.

Paul Pelosi purchased 15,000 more shares over the next three months, at much higher prices.

The total quantity was valued as high as $5 million, according to the then-speaker’s financial-disclosure form.

In late 2008, when the stock market soured,

Pelosi sold 1,000 of the first IPO shares for a meager profit of $2,500 to $5,000,

records show. He has kept the other 19,000 shares, which now are valued at $95 each.

Nancy Pelosi’s office denies that the meetings, the lobbying,

or her husband’s stock purchase had any influence on her legislative actions.

Drew Hammill, a spokesman for the Democratic leader,

said Paul Pelosi’s finances are kept distinctly separate from the congresswoman’s legislative work,

and she complies with all the legal as well as ethical obligations of her position.

He also pointed out that Pelosi has repeatedly advocated for legislation the credit-card industry dislikes.

Several bills affecting credit providers snaked through the House in 2008,

including one introduced by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.)

that would have ended the swipe fees, the small percentage that credit companies like Visa charge with every transaction.

Another bill by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), affording significant new protection to credit-card holders,

passed the House but did not make it through the Senate.

Conyers’s legislation passed his House Judiciary Committee with bipartisan support on Oct. 3, 2008,

the last day lawmakers were in office before leaving to campaign for the election,

but was not brought to the floor, which Pelosi controlled as speaker.

Pelosi’s office says she chose not to bring up the swipe-fee bills in 2008

because she did not believe President George W. Bush would sign them into law.

Pelosi tried for consumer protections in 2008,

but the next year she put more muscle behind the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights,

a bill that gave new protections to consumers and was opposed by the credit-card industry.

The bill was entirely devoted to preventing consumer exploitation,

and swipe fees were not included, a victory of sorts for the industry.

Only after Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois caught momentum with a bill

that would crack down on credit-card companies’ fees in 2009

did the provision eventually make it into law as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform

and Consumer Protection Act.

When confronted earlier this month at a press conference about the delay in swipe fees,

Pelosi said the House waited to act on the swipe fees until

“we had a president that could sign the bill.”

Her spokesman Hammill says it is preposterous to think Visa’s lobbying

or the stock purchases had any influence on the speaker’s legislative actions.



发表于 2011-11-16 04:22:51 | 显示全部楼层
太长,看洋文我头晕,古狗都懒的动
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-16 04:24:52 | 显示全部楼层
太长,看洋文我头晕,古狗都懒的动
bakula 发表于 2011-11-16 04:22


看法文不晕吧?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-11-16 04:44:40 | 显示全部楼层
看法文不晕吧?
柞里子 发表于 2011-11-15 21:24



太拽,还是中文看着舒心
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-11-16 05:08:26 | 显示全部楼层
太拽,还是中文看着舒心
bakula 发表于 2011-11-16 04:44
\

中文太长了也烦。老柞需要学会长话短说的介绍案情。能以最简便通俗的话,最少的篇幅,把事情的 来龙去脉讲清楚,那才是本事。


剧团的那个留学生的转贴,本来很有兴趣掺乎,结果看着看着就头大了。嘿嘿。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-16 06:16:00 | 显示全部楼层
\

中文太长了也烦。老柞需要学会长话短说的介绍案情。能以最简便通俗的话,最少的篇幅,把事情的 来龙去脉 ...
袜贩 发表于 2011-11-16 05:08


要是我说,可以比这短。不是我说的,如果截取了,大头会说:断章取义!
所以,必须全文转载。
嘿嘿
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|四海人民公摄 - 海外华人摄影爱好者网站

GMT+8, 2024-5-18 02:25

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

Copyright © 2001-2023 Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表